Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/5642/2007 of SIVA RAMA TEXTILES, VIJAYAWADA. Vs PUSPHA SYNTHETICS & 5 ORS, VIJAYAWADA. on 12 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5642/2007 Between: 1. SIVA RAMA TEXTILES, VIJAYAWADA., WHOLESALE CLOTH
APHC010246232007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5642/2007
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SIVA RAMA TEXTILES, VIJAYAWADA., WHOLESALE CLOTH MERCHANTS REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI JONNADULA TIRUPATHI RAO SHOP NO. 231, VASTHRALATHA VIJAYAWADA- 520001.
...PETITIONER AND
1. PUSPHA SYNTHETICS 5 ORS VIJAYAWADA, SURAT, REP BY ITS PROP. SUBHASH MAHESWARI VIJAYAWADA, REP BY GPA HOLDER SRI N. LOKESWARA GUPTA R/O RAVICHETTU CENTRE, NEAR HIMALAYA HOTEL KOTHAPET, VIJAYAWADA-520001.
2. NITHIN SILK MILLS, SURAT. ( NOT NECESSARY PARTY )
3. BIPIN KUMAR SHANTILAL, SURAT. ( NOT NECESSARY PARTY )
4. ANANTA DEEP CORPORATION, SURAT. ( NOT NECESSARY PARTY )
5. CHITRASREE PRINTS, SURAT. ( NOT NECESSARY PARTY )
6. P JANARDHAN, S/O SEETHA RAMAYYA PROPERTIES PANJA CENTRE ISLAMPET, VIJAYAWADA.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following ORDER :
On 27.02.2026, this Court passed the following order.
“On 28.01.2026, there was no representation on both sides. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
On 13.02.2026 also, there was no representation on both sides and the matter was directed to be listed under the same caption i.e., ‘for dismissal’.
However, today also, there is no representation on both sides.
However, to give one more chance, list on 13.03.2026 under the same caption as a last chance.”
2. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter.
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 13.03.2026 Dvs
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5642/2007 Dt: 13.03.2026 Dvs