Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1709/2012 of M/s.Bismilla Oil Industries, Vs Ch. Somasekhar, on 12 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1709/2012
APHC010366602012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1709/2012
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M/S.BISMILLA OIL INDUSTRIES,, YEMMIGANUR. KURNOOL DISTRICT REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR. T.K. KHAJA HUSSAIN
...PETITIONER AND
1. CH SOMASEKHAR, S/o. not known, Aged about 55 years, The Commercial Tax Officer No.1, Adoni. Kurnool District
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for willfully violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 04.06.2012 made in W.P. No.4386 of 2006 under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BHASKAR REDDY VEMIREDDY Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. SURIBABU S(SPL SC FOR CT AP)
The Court made the following: ORDER:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
Notice of respondent returned unserved with an endorsement ‘no such person’. This is an old contempt case of the year 2012. Till now, the petitioner could not serve notice on the respondent.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inspite of the efforts made by the petitioner, the whereabouts of the respondent could not be traced. He further submits that the petitioner is also no more and requests the Court to close the contempt case.
3. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 13.03.2026 ARR
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1709/2012 Date: 13.03.2026
ARR