Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3990/2025 of R. APPALA NARASAMMA Vs K. RAMACHANDRA MOHAN on 12 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3990/2025 Between: 1. R. APPALA NARASAMMA, W/O LATE RAMARAO, AGED 76 YEARS, R/O.
APHC010673162025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. R. APPALA NARASAMMA, W/O LATE RAMARAO, AGED 76 YEARS, R/O. 3-1/247/3, BACKSIDE OF SITHARA FUNCTION HALL, BALAJI COLONY, VIDYADARAPURAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. K RAMACHANDRA MOHAN, The Commissioner of Endowments, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, NTR District.
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondent and punish him under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 in violation of orders passed in W.P.No.9942 of 2025, Dt.06.05.2025 by the Hon'ble Smt. Justice Kiranmayee Mandava and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. NAGARAJU NAGURU
The Court made the following Order:
It is stated by Ms. Gorla Manasa, learned counsel representing Sri Pamarthi Kameswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner that the order of this Court passed in W.P.No.9942 of 2025, dated 06.05.2025 has been complied with by the respondents vide proceedings, dated 06.03.2026.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner further seeks liberty to challenge the said proceedings, dated 06.03.2026.
3. In view of the said submission by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the said proceedings dated 06.03.2026, if aggrieved. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 13.03.2026 MSI
Dated: 13.03.2026 MSI