Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2556/2011 of PUTTAVENKATESWARA RAO AND 2 OTHERS Vs HABIBUNNISA BEGUM [DIED] AND 3 OTHERS on 11 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2556/2011 Between: 1. PUTTAVENKATESWARA RAO AND 2 OTHERS, S/O LATE RAMA
APHC010588192011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2556/2011
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PUTTAVENKATESWARA RAO AND 2 OTHERS, S/O LATE RAMA RAO MUNICIPAL COUNCILOR R/O KALINGA ROAD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT.
2. P. SAKUNTHALAMMA, W/O LATE RAMA RAO C/O ANJANI KUMAR, ADVOCATE BRIDGE ROAD, NEAR UMARUDRA KOTESWARA TEMPLE,
3. P. RAJAKUMARI, W/O VENKATESWARA RAO ADVOCATE R/O G.T. ROAD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. HABIBUNNISA BEGUM DIED AND
OTHERS, W/O VENKATESWARA RAO ADVOCATE R/O G.T. ROAD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT.
2. M A RAVIOOF, S/O M. HASNUAMA R/O KAKI STREET, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT.
3. ADEEBI HASAM, S/O M.HASANUZZSAMA, R/O KAKI STREET, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT.
4. PRADEEP MANDAL, S/O NOT KNOWN BUSINESS R/O PLOT NO.11, VISAKHA B COLONY, SRIKAKULAM.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. D RAMALINGA SWAMY
2. N ANULA
3. D VIVEKANANDA PATNAIK
The Court made the following ORDER :
Sri S.Krishna Vamsi, learned counsel representing Sri K.Murali Krishna, learned for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 12.03.2026. Dvs
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2556/2011 Dt: 12.03.2026 Dvs