Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/1758/2026 of Vardhanapu Sharath Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 11 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1758/2026 Between: 1. VARDHANAPU SHARATH, S/O JOSEPH LATE,AGED 55
APHC010114692026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1758/2026
Between:
1. VARDHANAPU SHARATH, S/O JOSEPH LATE,AGED 55 YEARS, OCC
BUSINESS,R/O
YALLAVANIGARUVU
VILLAGE,PALAKOL
MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPL. PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR FOR CID/,STANDING COUNSEL FOR CID, HIGH
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH,AMARAVATHI.
2. K RANGARAJAN, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER,AGED 59
YEARS, OCC DY. GENERAL MANAGER B 8I 0,ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE,
29-14-59,
PRAKASAM
ROAD,SURYARAOPETA,
VIJAYAWADA-520002.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. M SOLOMON RAJU
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1758 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 by the petitioner/Accused No.12 for granting of pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No.8 of 2022 of CID Police Station, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 409, 120-B IPC and Section 13(2) of PC Act 1988.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/State.
3. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that since the petitioner is not shown as accused in the present crime, the question of threat of arrest does not arise.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the said submission made by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor the petition may be disposed of.
5. Recording the said submissions, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________
DR.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Date:12.03.2026 KNN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1758 of 2026 12.03.2026
KNN