Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/541/2017 of V.Pulla Reddy Vs N.Pollappa. on 11 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 541/2017 Between: 1. V.PULLA REDDY, S/O BALAVENKAT REDDY AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC.:
APHC010202862017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 541/2017
Between:
1. V.PULLA REDDY, S/O BALAVENKAT REDDY AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
OCC.:
FIELD
ASSISTANT,
SOMDEVIPALLI
GRAMPANCHAYAT,
RACHERLA
MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. N POLLAPPA, The Project Director, District Water Maganment Agency, Prakasam District
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Contemnor herein for willfully disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble High Court passed by His Lordship Sri Justice A.Ramalingeswara Rao in W.P.No.32314/2016 dated 23.09.2016
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. L J VEERA REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor:
NJS,J
C.C.NO.541 OF 2017
1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY)
The Court made the following:
NJS,J
C.C.NO.541 OF 2017
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Mr.N.Ranganadha Rao, learned counsel representing Mr.L.J.Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, in view of the subsequent developments in the contempt case, the cause does not survive for adjudication.
2. Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:12.03.2026 LSP