Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/527/2021 of M/s Siddhardha Constructions Private Ltd Regd. Off. No. 9-19-52, Vs Mr. V. Prasanna Venkatesh, on 11 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE No: 527 of 2021 Between: 1. M/S SIDDHARDHA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LTD., REGD. OFF. NO. 9-19-52, GROUND FLOOR, C.B.M. COMPOUND,
APHC010081642021
IN TH
THURSDA
TWO
THE HONOURA
CON
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M/S SIDDHARDHA NO. 9-19-52, G VISAKHAPATNAM N.SURENDRA BAB
1. MR. V.PRASANN VIJAYAWADA MUN BUILDING, VIJAYA Counsel for the Petition
1. M/S.INDUS LAW FI Counsel for the Contem
1. Mr.A.S.C. BOSE (SC
2. Ms.KOTHARU VIJA
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYAS NTEMPT CASE No: 527 of 2021 A CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LTD. GROUND FLOOR,
C.B.M.
- 530 003. REP. BY ITS MANAGIN BU AND NA VENKATESH, IAS,
CO NICIPAL CORPORATION, JAWAHA AWADA - 520 001. .. ner: RM mnor: C FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AYESWARI
DESH
H SURYA ., REGD. OFF. COMPOUND, NG DIRECTOR, ...PETITIONER OMMISSIONER, ARLAL NEHRU .CONTEMNOR S AP)
The Court made the following order:
The Contempt Case is filed alleging violation of the orders dated 10.08.2020 passed in W.P.No.60 of 2020. While disposing of the said writ petition, a direction was issued to the respondent No.2 to consider the representation made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon within eight weeks.
2. The respondent in the said writ petition / contemnor herein filed counter- affidavit inter alia stating that an amount of Rs.72,89,508/- was paid to the petitioner.
3. In the Additional Counter-affidavit, dated 03.04.2025, it was stated that an amount of Rs.14,63,30,861/- in all was paid to the petitioner and there are no dues.
4. However, in the Reply-Affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner while admitting that the petitioner received a sum of Rs.37,04,905/-, it is stated that an amount of Rs.31,30,138/- (Rs.7,30,824/- towards balance payment and Rs.23,99,314/- towards VAT Reimbursement) is yet to be paid. Thus, on the petitioner’s own admission, it received substantial amounts pursuant to the order dated 10.08.2020 in the writ petition.
5. As noted earlier, a direction was issued in the writ petition to consider the representation of the petitioner and in the light of the same, if the petitioner received the amounts in respect of the works executed by it and still amounts are to be paid, he may work out his remedies. This Court see no reason to continue the contempt proceedings and accordingly, the same is closed. No costs.
Consequently, all pending applications including I.A.No.1 of 2025 shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
Dt. 12.03.2026 BLV
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
C.C. No: 527 of 2021 Date: 12.03.2026 BLV