Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1196/2015 of PallameesalaNageswarao Rao Vs S. Delhi Rao, on 11 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1196/2015 Between: 1. PALLAMEESALANAGESWARAO RAO, S/O K.PRASAD AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
APHC010097242015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1196/2015
Between:
1. PALLAMEESALANAGESWARAO RAO, S/O K.PRASAD
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT
(UNDER SUSPENSION) JANGALAPALLY VILLAGE 0/O
MPDO, NUZENDLA MANDAL R/O NUZENDLA, GUNTUR
DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. S DELHI RAO, Project Director, District Water Management Agency (DWMA), Guntur
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondent herein and punish him in accordance with the provisions of the contempt of courts act for willful violation and disobedience of orders of this Hon'ble court passed in W.P.NO.1654 of 2015 dated 02.02.2015 by his Lordship Hon' ble Sri Jusice Nooty Ramamohana Rao and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL 6414 OF 2015
NJS,J
C.C.NO.1196 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K V RAJASREE
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY)
The Court made the following:
NJS,J
C.C.NO.1196 OF 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
No representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. At the time of considering the matter, Smt.P.Revathi, learned counsel representing the contemnors, placed a copy of proceedings dated 06.08.2015 of the Project Director, Guntur, for perusal of the Court. It appears that, pursuant to the orders passed in the Writ Petition, the respondent authorities have complied with the orders.
3. Keeping in view, the afflux of time the contempt case requires no consideration. Hence, the contempt case is closed. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:12.03.2026 LSP