Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/24075/2021 of SBNRM Aided High School, Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 11 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No,24075 OF 2021 Between: SBNRM Aided High School, Rep. by its Correspondent, B.Narayana Reddy
APHC010393282021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No,24075 OF 2021
Between:
SBNRM Aided High School, Rep. by its Correspondent, B.Narayana Reddy s/o Venkata Reddy, Aged 64 years, Kothapalli, Komarole Mandal, Prakasam District.
...Petitioner
AND
1.
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of School Education, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
2.
The Commissioner for School Education, Ibrahimpatnam, Vijayawada.
3.
Regional Joint Director of School Education, Arandalpet, Guntur.
4.
District Educational Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District.
5.
The District Collector, Prakasam District.
6.
Deputy Educational Officer, Markapur.
7.
M.Thirupathi Reddy, s/o late M.Venkat Reddy, aged 59 years, R/o Kothapalle village, Komarolu Mandal, Prakasam District.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order, writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring Memo No.ESE01/58/2019-PS dated 03.10.2021
issued by the 1st respondent, disposing the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 89(b) of the A.P. Education Act, 1982, without according any reasons as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same.
I.A. No.1 of 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Memo No.ESE01/58/2019-PS dated 03.10.2021
issued by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition.
I.A. No.1 of 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive counter on record by allowing the Leave Petition in the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner
:
Mr.Meka Rahul Chowdary
Counsel for R.1 to R.6
:
G.P. for Services III
Counsel for Respondent No.7:
M/s.Nimmagadda Revathi
The Court made the following ORDER:
Ms.G.Jahnavi, learned counsel referring to the Memo vide USR
No.31722 of 2026 filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner annexing the letter dated 12.3.2026 of the petitioner, submits that the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted.
2.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________
NINALA JAYASURYA,J
March 12, 2026
vasu
REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of School Education, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
2. The Commissioner for School Education, Ibrahimpatnam, Vijayawada.
3. Regional Joint Director of School Education, Arandalpet, Guntur.
4. District Educational Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District.
5. The District Collector, Prakasam District.
6. Deputy Educational Officer, Markapur.
7. M Thirupathi Reddy, s/o late M.Venkat Reddy, aged 59 years, R/o Kothapalle village, Komarolu Mandal, Prakasam District.
8. One CC to SRI. MEKA RAHUL CHOWDARY Advocate [OPUC]
9. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES III High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
10. One CC to SRI. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Advocate [OPUC]
11. Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT
NJSJ
DATED:12/03/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP NO. 24075 OF 2021