Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2686/2018 of R SEKAR Vs VENKAIAH CHOWDARY on 11 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2686/2018 Between: 1. R SEKAR, R/O MANGAMPET VILLAGE,OBULAVARIPALLI MANDAL,YSR
APHC010767972018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2686/2018
Between:
1. R SEKAR, R/O MANGAMPET VILLAGE,OBULAVARIPALLI
MANDAL,YSR DISTRICT.
2. R
KALYANI,
R/O
MANGAMPET
VILLAGE,OBULAVARIPALLI MANDAL,YSR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. VENKAIAH CHOWDARY, THE VICE CHAIRMAN CUM
MANAGING DIRECTOR,A.P.MINERAL DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
LIMTED,294/1D,TADIGADAPA
ROAD,KANURU
VILLAGE,PENAMALURU
MANDAL,
VIJAYAWADA- 521137.
2. SRI NAGARAJU, THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE
A.P.MINERAL
DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
LIMTED,294/1D,TADIGADAPA
ROAD,KANURU
VILLAGE,PENAMALURU
MANDAL,
VIJAYAWADA-
521137.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
NJS,J
C.C.NO.2686 OF 2018
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to pleased to punish the Contemnors herein for willfully disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble High Court passed by His Lordship Sri Justice A
Rajasekhar Reddy in WPMP.No. 29310/2014 in WP.No 23399/2014 dated 14.08.2014 i such manner and in such a way as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the Circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. L J VEERA REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
NJS,J
C.C.NO.2686 OF 2018
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Mr.N.Ranganadha Rao, learned counsel representing Mr.L.J.Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that, in view of the subsequent developments in the contempt case, the cause does not survive for adjudication.
2. Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:12.03.2026 LSP