Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/3442/2019 of V VASMIDHAR Vs THE STATE OF AP on 11 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3442/2019 Between: 1. V VASMIDHAR, S/O.LATE VENKATESWARA PRASAD, AGED 38 YEARS,

APHC010077042019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

WRIT PETITION NO: 3442/2019

Between:

1. V VASMIDHAR, S/O.LATE VENKATESWARA PRASAD, AGED

38 YEARS, R/O.NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA

PRADESH

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P.

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA

PRADESH, AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT

MACHILIPATNAM, A.P.

4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANDIGAMA TOWN POLICE

STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P.

5. P V RAMANA, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE

PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, INSPECTOR OF

POLICE, NOW VACANCY RESERVE, ATTACHED TO THE DIG

ELURU RANGE, ELURU.

6. NARRA KRISHNA RAO, S/O. LATE NARASIMHA RAO, AGED

ABOUT 50 YEARS, RIO RAITHU PETA, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

7. SMT NARRA INDRANI, W/O. KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55

YEARS,

R/O

RAITHU

PETA,

NANDIGAMA,

KRISHNA

DISTRICT.

8. NARRA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O LATE NARASIMHA RAO, AGED

ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O RAITHU PETA, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or other proceedings more particularly one in the writ of mandamus directing the CB CID of State of Andhra Pradesh to take over the investigation of my complaint registered as FIR No.8 of 2018 of Nandigama Town Police Station by taking over the records from the Nandigama Town Circle Office and to investigate it and to file necessary charge-sheets or final reports before the Courts IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to stay all further proceedings in FIR No. 8 of 2018 of Nandigama Town Police Station by the respondents 3 & 4 during the pendency of this writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. NAUMENE SURAPARAJ KARLAPALEM

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME (AP)

2. YALLABANDI RAMATIRTHA

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI

WRIT PETITION No.3442 OF 2019

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate writ, order or other proceedings more particularly one in the writ of mandamus directing the CB CID of State of Andhra Pradesh to take over the investigation of my complaint registered as FIR No.8 of 2018 of Nandigama Town Police Station by taking over the records from the Nandigama Town Circle Office and to investigate it and to file necessary charge-sheets or final reports before the Courts and pass…”

2. None appeared for the petitioner though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.

3. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and Sri Yallabandi Ramatirtha, learned counsel for respondent Nos.6 to 8 are in attendance.

4. The writ petition is filed seeking transfer of the case to C.I.D. Department for investigation.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader already submitted that the case in Crime No.08 of 2018 registered against unofficial respondents on the file of Nandigama Town Police Station, has already been transferred to C.I.D. Department on 08.07.2019. In that view of the matter, no further orders are required in the writ petition.

6. In the light of above submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader that the case was already been handed over to C.I.D. police for investigation, as requested by the writ petitioner, no further orders are required in the writ petition.

7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission, without going into merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 12.03.2026 Pmk

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI

WRIT PETITION No:3442 OF 2019

Date: 12.03.2026

Pmk

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead