Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/2272/2013 of M/S SIVA SANKAR ICE FACTORY, PRAKASAM DIST. & 2 OT Vs SECRETARY., A.P.E.R.C., HYD & 4 OT on 11 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 2272/2013 Between: 1. M/S SIVA SANKAR ICE FACTORY, PRAKASAM DIST. & 2 OT, PROP:
APHC010618872013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2272/2013
Between:
1. M/S SIVA SANKAR ICE FACTORY, PRAKASAM DIST. & 2
OT, PROP: JETHWANI NARESH KUMAR. S/O. LATE
CHETAN DAS, OCC: BUSINESS, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O.PAPAYAPALEM ROAD.KOTHAPETA. VETAPALEM
MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
2. M/S.
J.D.ICE-CUM-COLD
STORAGE,,
PROP:
MOHAMMED
JAMULUDDIN,
S/O.JAN
MOHAMMED,
AGED
YEARS,
OCC;BUSINESS,
R/O.SERVEY
NO.483/1, PRASAD NAGAR,KOTHAPETA, VETAPALEM
MANDAL. PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
3. KURRA
VENKATESWARA
RAO,,
S/O.HANUMAIAH,
AGED 72 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,PROPRIETOR OF
M/S.SRI
LAKSHMI
SRINIVASA
RICE
MILL,R/O.
RAMAPURAM
ROAD,
AKKAYAPALEM.VETAPALEM
MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. SECRETARY A P E R C HYD 4 OT, 4TH AND 5TH
FLOOR, SINGARENI BHAVAN, RED HILLS, HYDERABAD
NJS,J
W.P.No.2272 of 2013
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF
ANDHRA PRADESH, LIMITED, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN &
MANAGING
DIRECTOR.
TIRUPATHI,
CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.
3. SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER OPERATION CIRCLE, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF
ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITED, ONGOLE. PRAKASAM
DISTRICT.
4. ELECTRICITY
REVENUE
OFFICERCUMASSISTANT
ACCOUNTS
OFFICER,
SOUTHERN
POWER
DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH
LIMITED. CHIRALA - NS, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
5. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT ENGINEER, SOUTHERN
POWER
DISTRIBUTION
COMPANY
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH
LIMITED,
VETAPALEM
VILLAGE
AND
MANDAL. PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS
declaring the action of the respondents in determining and approving fuel surcharge adjustment (FSA) for the Financial Year 2010-2011 and 2011-12 and for 1st quarter of Financial year 2012-2013 pursuant to order of 15t respondent as illegal, contrary to Regulation No.1 of 2003 being arbitrary, without jurisdiction or Power, and in violation of principles of natural justice and the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998 and Electricity Act, besides
violating
petitioners'
rights
guaranteed tinder Art, 2003 besides violating petitioners rights guaranteed 14. 19 (1) (g) and 300-A of Constitution of India to declare the action of the respondents imposing restrictions and
NJS,J
W.P.No.2272 of 2013
measures on contract power supply and consumption vide proceedings No.APERC/Secy/14/20120-13 dated 14-09-2012 as arbitrary. illegal and public policy and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 2741 OF 2013
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay the collection of FSA charges by the Respondents for all quarters of financial years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 including penalties pursuant to the proceedings No.APERC/Secy/14/20120-13 dated 14-09-2012 from the petitioners, Pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
2. V V SATISH
The Court made the following:
NJS,J
W.P.No.2272 of 2013
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Ms.P.Satya Haritha, learned counsel representing Mr. Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the matter has become infructuous.
2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted, if any, shall stand vacated. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:12.03.2026 LSP