Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6923/2026 of VANGALI DINESH KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 11 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI WRIT PETITION NO: 6923/2026 Between: 1. VANGALI DINESH KUMAR, S/O. VANGALI NARASIMHULU, AGED 26 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3/126 KAMANUR, KADAPA
APHC010130412026
IN TH
THURSDA
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
THE HONOURAB
W
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VANGALI DINESH YEARS, R/O. KAMANUR, KADAP
1. THE STATE OF A SECRETARY TO SECRETARIAT, VE
2. THE SUPERINTEN NANDYAL - 518501
3. THE SUB DI TOWNPRESENTLY MANDAL, NANDYA
4. THE CIRCLE INSP STATION, NANDYA
5. THE SUB INSPEC STATION, NANDYA
6. THE SUB INSPEC STATION NANDYA E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G RIT PETITION NO: 6923/2026 KUMAR, S/O. VANGALI NARASIMH D.NO.3/126-1, CHENNAMARAJU PA DISTRICT, A.P. AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT O GOVERNMENT, HOME D ELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR NDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL
1. 3. VISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, Y INCHARGE OF ALLAGADDA AL DISTRICT, A.P - 518501 ECTOR OF POLICE, ALLAGADDA T AL DISTRICT - 518543. CTOR OF POLICE, ALLAGADDA T AL DISTRICT - 518543. CTOR OF POLICE, ALLAGADDA RU AL DISTRICT. A.P DESH
H DRANATH ROY GEDELA ULU, AGED 26 UPALLI, VTC ...PETITIONER TS PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT. DISTRICT AT , NANDYAL TOWN AND TOWN POLICE TOWN POLICE URAL POLICE
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.6923 of 2026
7. VANGALI SAI GOWTHAM, S/O VANGALINARASIMHULU, AGED 23 YEARS, R/OD.NO.3/126-1, CHENNAMARAJUPALLI, VTC KAMANUR, KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P.- 516361
8. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS directing Respondents 2 to 6 to forthwith produce the body of Vangali Sai Gowtham, S/o Vangali Narasimhulu, aged years, R/o D.No.3/126-1, Chennamarajupalli, VTC Kamanur, Kadapa District, presently in the illegal custody of Allagadda Town Police Station since 06.03.2026 at 06 30 PM, before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty by declaring his detention illegal, unconstitutional, and direct the Respondents 2 to 6 to return my hard earned money of Rs.70,000 for gross violation of Articles 21 and 22, custodial torture, and illegal detention exceeding 3 days without production before Magistrate and in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to produce the detenue person who is my younger brother by name Vangali Sai Gowtham, S/o VangaliNarasimhulu, aged 26 years, R/o D.No.3/126-1, Chennamarajupalli, VTC Kamanur, Y.S.R. Kadapa District, before this Hon'ble Court from the illegal custody of respondents 2to 6 or anybody from the Nandyal District Police and set him be free, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAJA DAMOJI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.6923 of 2026
The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
When the matter is taken up for admission, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the order of remand.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty, as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 12.03.2026 MDP