Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/2376/2026 of CHIRLA SRINIVASA REDDY Vs THE STATE OF AP on 11 March 2026
ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No.: W.P.No.2376 of 2026 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 06. 22.04.2026 HCJ & RSR, J DR, J I.A.No.2 of 2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This Interlocutory Application is filed under the caption „for being
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No.: W.P.No.2376 of 2026
PROCEEDING SHEET
SL.
No.
DATE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE
06. 22.04.2026
DR, J I.A.No.2 of 2026
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
This Interlocutory Application is filed under the caption „for being mentioned‟ seeking modification of the order by incorporating the words in para 6 of the order after the words “to the posts of Junior Lecturers under 10% quota” by adding “and the next higher posts in the non-teaching category, as per their eligibility”, in the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.2376 of 2026, dated 12.03.2026, which reads as follows:
“6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents, particularly the 3rd respondent, to consider the case of the petitioners for inclusion in the panel for appointment to the post of Junior Lecturer under the 10% quota, in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.”
SL. No. DATE
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE
.
Taking into consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and for the reasons stated therein, this Court deems it appropriate to substitute the order passed in the writ petition in the following terms: “6. considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents, particularly the 3rd respondent, to consider the case of the petitioners for inclusion in the panel for appointment and the next higher posts in the non-teaching category, as per their eligibility, in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.”
Accordingly, this Interlocutory Application No. 1 of 2026 is ordered.
Registry is directed to incorporate the necessary changes before issuing a fresh copy of the orders.
______ DR, J RMD