Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/3586/2024 of M/S SRI MOUNICA CONSTRUCTIONS Vs SRI SASHI BHUSAN KUMAR IAS on 11 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3586/2024 Between: 1. M/S SRI MOUNICA CONSTRUCTIONS, D.NO. 2 MERIAPALEM VILLAGE, ATREYAPURAM MANDAL, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. REP.BY

APHC010381302024

IN TH

THURSDA

TWO

THE HONOURA

CO

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. M/S SRI MOUNICA MERIAPALEM DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR MANAGING PARTN

2. MALLIDI V.V. SA AGED 38 YEARS SRINIVASA NAGA MANDAL, DR.B.R.A

1. SRI SASHI BHU PANCHAYAT RAJ VELAGAPUDI, TH DISTRICT.

2. SRI PEEYUSH KU DEPARTMENT,

THULLUR MANDAL

3. SRI B BALU NAIK Z.P.COMPOUND, VIJAYAWADA.

4. SRI P RAM REDD OFFICER, NIDHI B E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL NTEMPT CASE NO: 3586/2024 A CONSTRUCTIONS, D.NO. 2-214, VILLAGE, ATREYAPURAM R KONASEEMA DISTRICT.

NER MALLIDI V.V. SATYANARAYAN ATYANAIRAYANA REDDY,, S/O. S, OCC-CONTRACTOR, R/O. AR, MERIAPALEM VILLAGE, AT AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT ...P AND SAN KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL J DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT HULLUR MANDAL,

AMARAVA UMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETA SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, L, GUNTUR DISTRICT. K, THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, PAN OPPOSITE TO PWD GROUNDS, DY, THE DIRECTOR OF WORKS AN BHAVAN, MANGALAGIRI IT PARK, DESH

H LAPATI , MAIN ROAD, MANDAL, REP.BY ITS NA REDDY. SUBBIREDDY, H.NO. 2-127, TREYAPURAM T. PETITIONER(S) SECRETARY, T BUILDINGS, ATI, GUNTUR ARY, FINANCE AMARAVATI, CHAYAT RAJ, , M.G.ROAD, ND ACCOUNT BEHIND APIIC

BUILDING, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

5. SRI M SRINIVAS, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

6. SRI K G J NAIDU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ (PR) PIU DIVISION (PRED), SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for willful violation of orders of this Hon’ble Court in WP.No. 4932 of 2024 dated 01-04-2024 delivered by Hon’ble Sri. Justice Ravi Cheemalapati and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing original copy of order dated 01- 04-2024 in WP.No. 4932 of 2024 pending disposal of the Contempt Case and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to discharge the Respondent No.6 from the array of respondents in the CC.No.3586 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the Proposed Respondent No.7 as the Party Respondent No.6 in the place of respondent No.6 to the C.C.No.3586 of 2024 in W.P. No. 4932 of 2024 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. KAMIREDDY DIVYA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. NAGARAJU NAGURU

2. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA

3. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI

The Court made the following order:

This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 01.04.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.4932 of 2024.

Sri Nandipalle Venkatesh, learned counsel, representing Smt Kamireddy Divya, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 01.04.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.4932 of 2024, hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the Contempt Case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 12.03.2026 MP

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CONTEMPT CASE NO:3586 of 2024 Date: 12.03.2026

MP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead