CC/3702/2024 of PAPPURI NARASIMHULU Vs SRI G SAI PRASAD on 11 March 2026

APHC010407152024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

CONTEMPT CASE No.3702 OF 2024

Between:

Pappuri Narasimhulu, S/o Late P. Narasimhulu, Aged 40 years, Residing at Shankarapuram Village, Chinnakesham Palle Post, Badvel Mandal, Y.S.R.

Kadapa District.

...Petitioner

AND

1.

Sri G.Sai Prasad, Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

2.

Sri V Vijayarama Raju, District Collector, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh

3.

Sri A Venkataramana, Revenue Divisional Officer, Badvel, Y.S.R

Kadapa District Andhra Pradesh.

4.

Sri V Mallikarjuna Reddy, Tahsildar, previously worked for Badvel Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.

5.

U Madhusudhan Rao, Tahsildar, Badvel Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Respondents

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents under sections 10

to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for willful violation, flouting and disobeying the orders of this Honble Court passed in W.P.No. 34239 of 2022

dated 20-10-2022 and pass.

I.A. No.1 of 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 270 days in filing the Contempt Petition against the respondents for violating the orders passed by the Honble Court in Writ Petition W.P. No. 34239 of 2022, dated 20.10.2022.

Counsel for the Petitioner

:

Mr.T.Diwakar Reddy

Counsel for the Respondents:

---

The Court made the following ORDER:

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the orders passed on the petitioner’s application dated 27.8.2020, no orders are required to be passed in the Contempt Case.

2.

Recording the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Needless to observe that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the orders passed on the application, he may seek recourse to Law.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, including I.A. No.1 of 2024, shall stand closed.

_____________________

NINALA JAYASURYA, J

March 12, 2026

vasu

REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. SRI G SAI PRASAD, Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

2. Sri V Vijayarama Raju, District Collector, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh

3. Sri A Venkataramana, Revenue Divisional Officer, Badvel, Y.S.R Kadapa District Andhra Pradesh.

4. Sri V Mallikarjuna Reddy, Tahsildar, previously worked for Badvel Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.

5. U Madhusudhan Rao, Tahsildar, Badvel Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.

6. One CC to SRI. T DIWAKAR REDDY Advocate [OPUC]

7. One CC to SRI. Advocate [OPUC]

8. Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT

NJSJ

DATED:12/03/2026