Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/579/2013 of M/S.ANASUYA ICE FACTORY,PRAKASAM,&ANOT Vs APERC,CHAIRMAN,HYD,& 6 on 11 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 579/2013 Between: 1. M/S.ANASUYA ICE FACTORY,PRAKASAM,&ANOT, REP. BY ITS
APHC010539982013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 579/2013
Between:
1. M/S.ANASUYA ICE FACTORY,PRAKASAM,&ANOT, REP.
BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, BONDALAPATI ANANDA
MADHAVI, W/O. SYAINU SUNDA REDDY, AGED 33
YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, SURVEY NUMBER 698, NEAR
AIULANANDA ASHRAMAM, DANVAYA PETA ROAD,
VODAREVU VILLAGE, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM
DISTRICT.
2. M/S.
C.P.R.
LCE
INDUSTRIES,,
REP.
BY
ITS
PROPRIETOR CHITRA PRASADA RAO, S/O. APPALA
RAO,
AGED
YEARS,
OCE:BUSINESS,
NEAR
ARULANANDA ASHRAMAM, DANVAYA PETA ROAD,
VODAREVU CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. APERC CHAIRMAN HYD 6, SINGARENI MAYAN, RED
HILLS, HYDERABAD REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
2. ANDHRA
PRADESH
POWER
COORDINATION
COMMITTEE, VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD REP. BY
ITS CHIEF ENGINEER [COMMERCIAL].
NJS,J
W.P.NO.579 OF 2013
3. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF
ANDHRA PRADESH LTD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND
MANAGING
DIRECTOR,
TIRUPATHI,
CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.
4. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION CIRCLE, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF
ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITED, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM
DISTRICT.
5. SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, OPERATION CIRCLE, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF
ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITED, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM
DISTRICT.
6. ELECTRICITY
REVENUE
OFFICERCUMASSISTANT
ACCOUNTS
OFFICER,
SOUTHERN
POWER
DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH
LIMITED, CHIRALA - NS, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
7. ADDITIONAL
ASSISTANT
ENGINEER,
ODAREVU,
SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF
ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITED, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ. order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders issued by 1st respondent in proceeding No.
APERC/Secy/Jt. Director (Tariff Engg) / No.5, APERC / Secy / Jt.
Dir (Tariff Engg) / No. 06, APERC / Secy / Jt. Dir (Tariff - Engg) /
No. 07 and APERC / Scey / Jt. Dir. (Tariff - Engg) / No.08, even dt. 05 06.2010, purportedly determining, and approving fuel surcharge adjustment [FSA] for the financial year 2008-2009
April, 2008 to March. 2009] contrary to regulation No. 1 of 2003
and without any notice or public hearing as required by law as
NJS,J
W.P.NO.579 OF 2013
illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction or power, and in violation of principles of ratural justice and provisions of Electricity Act, 2003, besides violating petitioners' rights guaranteed under Art. 14, 19 (1) (g) and 300-A of Constitution of India and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to refund the amounts collected towards FSA charges in the monthly bills from July, 2010 onwards IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 698 OF 2013
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of orders issued by 1st respondent in proceeding No.
APERC/Secy/Jt. Director (Tariff Engg) / No.5, APERC / Secy / Jt.
Dir (Tariff Engg) / No. 06, APERC / Secy / Jt. Dir (Tariff - Engg) /
No. 07 and APERC / Scey / Jt. Dir. (Tariff - Engg) / No.08, even dt. 05 06.2010, restraining the respondents from levying and collecting FSA and consequently direct the respondents not to charge any amount towards fuel surcharges from the petitioners, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI
2. V R REDDY KOVVURI (SC FOR APCPDCL)
The Court made the following:
NJS,J
W.P.NO.579 OF 2013
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Ms.P.Satya Haritha, learned counsel representing Mr.Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the matter has become infructuous.
2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted, if any, shall stand vacated. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:12.03.2026 LSP