Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1702/2023 of SMT.BOGGULA PADMAVATHI Vs SRI RAMA KRISHNA on 11 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1702/2023 Between: 1. SMT.BOGGULA PADMAVATHI, W/O. BOGGULA PULLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
APHC010128452023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1702/2023
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SMT.BOGGULA PADMAVATHI, W/O. BOGGULA PULLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, RIO. D.NO.4-7-261, STATE BANK COLONY, PULIVENDULA TOWN, Y.S.R DISTRICT.
2. SMT.YETURI GOWRI, W/O. MURALI MOHAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, RIO. KAPU STREET, RAPUR, NELLORE DISTRICT.
3. SMT. S.TULASI, W/O. RAVINATHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, RIO.DOOR NO.1/15, NAGURU, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R DISTRICT.
4. SMT. N.VIJAYA, W/O. PRATAP REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, RIO. FLAT NO.516, BLOCK NO.2, B.K.SINGH TOWERS, NEAR NEW AYYAPPA SWAMY TEMPLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
5. SMT. BOGGULA SUSMITHA, D/O. BOGGULA PULLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, RIO. FLAT NO.516, BLOCK NO.2, B.K SINGH TOWERS, NEAR NEW AYYAPPA SWAMY TEMPLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. SRI RAMA KRISHNA, THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, ANDHRA PRADESH. NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH
2. SRI SHAIK NAZEER SAB, THE SUB-REGISTRAR, PULIVENDULA, Y.S.R.DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under the provisions of Sections 10 to 12 of the Contemptof Courts Act, 1971 for their willful, deliberate and intentional violation of the orders of this Honourable Court, dated 15.07.2022 made in W.P.No.29150 of 2021 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NARASIMHA REDDY. G . L The Court made the following:
The Court made the following Order:
1. This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 15.07.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.29150 of 2021, with a direction to the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to receive, register, and release the document submitted by the State Financial Corporation.
2. On the last occasion, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contemnors submitted that the documents has been registered and released, and also produced the documents.
3. Though the matter was adjourned at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner to obtain latest instructions, even today the learned counsel is unable to place any further instructions.
4. Considering the said submissions, and in view of the fact that the respondents have already complied with the orders of this Court, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date :12.03.2026 JLSR
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
C.C. No.1702 of 2023
12.03.2026 JLSR