Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1067/2023 of AUDIO TEKK SRI SAI RAM ELECTRONICS Vs ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL,I.A.S on 10 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1067/2023 Between: 1. AUDIO TEKK SRI SAI RAM ELECTRONICS, REPRESENTED BY
APHC010078802023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1067/2023
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. AUDIO TEKK SRI SAI RAM ELECTRONICS, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETRIX TADI SARADAKUMARI,W/O SRINIVAS KUMAR, DOOR NO.78-2-5/2, FIRST FLOOR, SOMALAMMA TEMPLE STREET, NEAR RTC COMPLEX, GANDHI NAGAR RAJ AMAHENDRAVARAM - 533101 EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER AND
1. ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI NATARAJAN GULZAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VCLAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. PS GIRISHA I A S, ,DISTRICT COLLECTOR ANNAMAYA DISTRICT.
4. MEDIDA JAHNAVI SUB COLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
5. M A MURALI, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. RR 1 AND 2 DISCHARGED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.23/03/2023.
6. SRI CHAMAKURI SRIDHAR I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR MADANAPALLE ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT
7. SRI MEGA SWARUP I A S, SUB DISTRICT COLLECTOR MADANAPALLE ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT RR6 AND 7 ARE SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 17 06 2025 IN C C NO 1067 OF 2023
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to summon and punish the respondents herein under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of the Court Act for willfully disobeying and non-implementing the orders passed by the Honourable Court in Writ Petition No. 31436 of 2022 dated 30.9.2022 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Y SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. ASHOK RAM V
2. T BALASWAMI
3. SUSHMA YAGANTI
4. P RAJANI REDDY
5. T N M RANGA RAO
The Court made the following ORDER:
1. This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 30.09.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.31436 of 2022.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 30.09.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.31436 of 2022, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date :11.03.2026 RSD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
C.C. No.1067 of 2023
Date :11.03.2026 RSD