Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/848/2023 of B. PRATAP REDDY Vs SRI GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI, IAS on 10 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 848/2023 Between: 1. B. PRATAP REDDY, S/O. VENKATRAMEE REDDY, AGED 60

APHC010065082023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 848/2023

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. B. PRATAP REDDY, S/O. VENKATRAMEE REDDY, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. CHINIGEPALLI, CHINNAGATTIGALLU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. SRI GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PR AND RD BLOCK NO. 5, A.P. SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.

2. K VENKATRAMA REDDY, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.

3. HANUMAN NAIK, THE TAHSILDAR,

CHINNAGATTIGALU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.

4. SATYANARAYANA REDDY, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.

5. RAJAJI, THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, CHINNAGATTIGALU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.

6. M MOHAN REDDY, THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHINNAGATTIGALU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully and intentionally disobeying the order dated 06.01.2023 passed in I.A. No. 1 of 2023 in W.P.No.818 of 2023 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. JAVVAJI SARATH CHANDRA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. T BALASWAMI

2. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI

3. G VENKATA REDDY

The Court made the following ORDER:

1. This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 06.01.2023 passed in I.A. No. 1 of 2023 in W.P.No.818 of 2023.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the contemnors submits that subsequently after passing of interim orders, upon the submissions of the respondents that there is no proposal for laying CC Road, this Court had closed the main writ petition No.818 of 2023, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.

3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date :11.03.2026 RSD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

C.C. No.848 of 2023

Date :11.03.2026 RSD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead