Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1024/2025 of BUDATA JAGADEESH Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 10 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 1024/2025 Between: 1. BUDATA JAGADEESH, S/O. B.KRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
APHC010019092025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 1024/2025
Between:
1. BUDATA JAGADEESH, S/O. B.KRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 31
YEARS, R/O.1-1-229. KONDI VEEDI, MOGILIPADU VILLAGE,.
PALASA
MANDAL,
SRIKAKULAM
DISTRICT,
ANDHRA
PRADESH-532221.
2. KONA TARAKESWARA RAO,, S/O.APPAIADASU AGED ABOUT
64 YEARS, R/O. 1-152, PEDDA VEEDHI, JALUMURU, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -
532432.
3. KAYA BHIMASENU, S/O.K.KOTESH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O.1-440,PALLI VEEDI, KAVITI MANDAL, KAPASAKUDDI
VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-
532322.
4. SANAPALA SYAMALA,, W/O. TRINADHA RAO AGED ABOUT 55
YEARS, R/O.3-64, CHEEDI PETA, VANDRANGI, SRIKAKULAM
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-532168.
5. KONDALA NAGARAJU,, S/O.K. APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 45
YEARS,
R/O.5-203/A,
KOTHAVEEDI,
PONDURU,
SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 532168 .
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
CIVIL
SUPPLIES
DEPARTMENT,
A.P.SECRETARIAT
OFFICE,
VELAGAPUDI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522237.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, CIVIL SUPPLIES
DEPARTMENT
AND
EX-OFFICIO
SECRETARY
TO
GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA.
3. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION
LIMITED, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT 10-152/1, SRI SAI
TOWERS, BANDAR ROAD, VIJAYAWADA- 520007.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Proceedings in
CC.Ref.No.PDS.II(1)/1025/114/2023
Dt.26.02.2024
issued by the 2nd Respondent to shift fair price shops from Jalamuru, Palasa, Ichapuram, G-sigadam and Srikakulam MLS points respectively and adding the same to other MLS points as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, discriminatory, irrational, without jurisdiction, suffers from colourable exercise of power, violative of Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside impugned proceedings Dt. 26.02.2024 to the extent of the said MLS points and direct the Respondents not to shift the said fair shops from the said five MLS points and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to shift any of the fair price shops from Jalamuru, Palasa, Ichapuram, G- sigadam and Srikakulam MLS
points
by
suspending
the
Proceedings
in
CC.Ref.No.PDS.II(1)/1025/114/20 23 Dt.26.02.2023 issued by the 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. MD.SALEEM SC For APSCSC Limited,Vijayawda
2. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri K.Devi Prasanna Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 11th March, 2026
RKS