Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/7027/2026 of Kasula Vinod Kumar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 10 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7027/2026 Between: 1. KASULA VINOD KUMAR,, S/O LATE VENKATA RATNAM, AGED
APHC010131502026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 7027/2026
Between:
1. KASULA VINOD KUMAR,, S/O LATE VENKATA RATNAM, AGED
ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 18/405, RANGAIAH
GARI STREET, PRODDATUR TOWN, KADAPA DISTRICT.
2. KASULA RAJESWARI,, W/O KASULA VINOD KUMAR, AGED ABOUT
70 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O D.NO. 18/405, RANGAIAH GARI
STREET, PRODDATUR TOWN, KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
HOME
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522237
2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH 522503
3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, RANGE 2, KUMOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH.518001
4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , KADAPA CITY AND
KADAPA DISTRICT 516001
5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, O/O DEPUTY
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA CITY, KADAPA
DISTRICT 516001
6. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C.K.DINNE POLICE
STATION, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.
7. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , C.K.DINNE POLICE STATION,
C.K.DINNE MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT- 516216
8. SUBBARAYUDU, , DOCUMENT WRITER, C/O SUB-REGISTRAR
OFFICE (RURAL AND URBAN), KADAPA CITY AND DISTRICT
516216
9. B SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE, S/O NEELAKANTA RAO, D.N0.2/937- 6A, SRI HARI RAO STREET, NAGARAJUPETA, KADAPA CITY AND
DISTRICTS 516001
10. YERRAGUNTLA OBUL REDDY, , S/O YERRAGUNTLA NADIPI
SUBBA REDDY, D.NO. 1/65, TADIGOTLA VILLAGE, CK DINNE
MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICTS 216216
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K MUNI REDDY BALA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION NO: 7027 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “ … may be pleased to Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or Direction; a) Directing the official Respondents I to 7 their subordinates and agents to forthwith desist from interfering in the civil dispute pertaining to the Property i.e., the Land in Sy.No.355/1, Ac.6.23 cents Tadigotla Revenue Village, Kopparthi Panchayath, Kadapa District;
b) Directing the official Respondents 1 to 7 not to threaten or force the Petitioners to come to the police station for settlement of the civil dispute with the Respondents 8 and 9; c) Directing the Respondents 2 to 5 herein to consider the representation/legal notice dated 14.08.2025 and take appropriate action against the Respondents 6 and 7 for involving in civil disputes which are within the exclusive jurisdiction of civil courts and Pass..”.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that, without there being any crime registered against the petitioners, the police are calling them to the Police Station. Learned counsel would further submit that the petitioners are aged persons and that it is very difficult for them to attend the Police Station.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that they have received a complaint from one Mr. Subrahmanyam through the Public Grievances Redressal System addressed to the Superintendent of Police, which was forwarded to the concerned Police Station. The police are conducting a preliminary enquiry in the matter. The complaint, prima facie, discloses a cognizable offence and the matter is under process. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders
5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law with regard to the complaint received against the petitioners. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date:11.03.2026 KNN
WP.No.7027 of 2026 Dt.11.03.2026
KNN