WP/38359/2022 of M RAMACHANDRA NAIDU Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 10 March 2026

1. M RAMACHANDRA YEARS, R/O PLO TIRUPATI (RURAL 517501.

1. THE STATE OF SECRETARY, IRR PRADESH, VELAG

2. THE STATE OF SECRETARY, RE PRADESH, VELAG

3. THE DISTRICT CO PRADESH.

4. THE CHIEF ENGIN DISTRICT, ANDHRA

5. THE REVENUE D KADAPA, ANDHRA

6. THE TAHSIDAR O KADAPA, ANDHRA

7. THE EXECUTIVE E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARC O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL RIT PETITION NO: 38359/2022 A NAIDU, S/O M RAMALINGAM NA OT NO. 83, SRINIVASAPURAM TI L), TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY IT RIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. APUDI, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVAT ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY IT EVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. APUDI, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVAT OLLECTOR, YSR DISTRICT KADA NEER OF TELUGU GANGA PROJE A PRADESH. DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BADVEL, Y A PRADESH. OF MYDHUKURU MANDALAM, Y A PRADESH. ENGINEER OF TELUGU GANG DESH

CH LAPATI IDU, AGED 55 RUCHANOOR, A PRADESH- ...PETITIONER TS PRINCIPAL OF ANDHRA TI. TS PRINCIPAL OF ANDHRA TI. APA, ANDHRA CT, , KADAPA YSR DISTRICT YSR DISTRICT GA PROJECT,

PORUMAMILLA VILLAGE, YSR DISTRICT KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

8. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OF IRRIGATION DIVISION, YSR DISTRICT KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

9. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BADVEL, YSR DISTRICT KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not considering the representation dated 16/09/2022 of the petitioner in seeking Assignment of government lands situated at Nandhyalampet Village, S. Mydhukuru Mandalam, YS11 District Kadapa, instead of paying damages incurred to the petitioner's land in tune with the proceedings of 6th respondent passed vide its Reference. C/62/2022 Dated 25/01/2022 as illegal arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 15, 16,19,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to consider and pass appropriate orders on petitioner's representation dated 16.09.2022 with in a time bound period as this Hon'ble court deem fit and proper and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pass appropriate orders considering the representation of the petitioner dated 16/09/2022 in accordance with law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

2. GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV

The Court made the following order:

Sri A.Tarun Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that pursuant to the directions of this Court dated 15.03.2023, respondent No.6 has passed order vide Ref.C/62/2022 dated 12.05.2023 on the petitioner’s representation dated 16.09.2022. He further submits that the petitioner intends to challenge the said order before the appropriate forum and therefore prays to close the Writ Petition giving liberty to the petitioner to question the said order before the appropriate forum.

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infrucutous granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order vide Ref.C/62/2022 dated 12.05.2023 passed by respondent No.6 before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 11.03.2026 MP

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 38359 of 2022 Date: 11.03.2026

MP