Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/2067/2025 of THOTA RAMESH Vs THE STATE OF AP on 10 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2067/2025 Between: 1. THOTA RAMESH, F.P. SHOP DEALER, F.P. SHOP NO. 0855019,, C/O. CHILICHERLA VILLAGE, ULAVAPADU MANDAL, ANDHRA PRADESH. 1.
APHC010035652025
IN TH
WEDNESD
TWO
THE HONOURA
W
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THOTA RAMESH, C/O. CHILICHER PRADESH.
1. THE STATE OF SECRETARY, CIV BUILDINGS, AT VE
2. THE DISTRICT C PRADESH.
3. THE JOINT CO PRADESH.
4. THE SUB COLL ANDHRA PRADESH
5. THE TAHSILDAR, U
6. THE ENFORCEM PRAKASAM DISTR Petition under Articl circumstances stated in pleased to issue a Writ, o E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARC O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL RIT PETITION NO: 2067/2025 F.P. SHOP DEALER, F.P. SHOP RLA VILLAGE, ULAVAPADU MAND AND AP, REPRESENTED BY THE VIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, S ELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHR OLLECTOR, , PRAKASAM DISTR OLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRIC LECTOR, KANDUKUR, PRAKASA H. ULAVAPADU MANDAL, PRAKSAM D MENT DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, RICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RES le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High order or Orders more particularly one DESH
CH LAPATI NO. 0855019,, DAL, ANDHRA ...PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT RA PRADESH. ICT, ANDHRA CT, ANDHRA AM DISTRICT, DISTRICT. KANDUKUR, SPONDENT(S): aying that in the h Court may be e in the nature of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4TH respondent initiated proceedings dated 30.12.2024, RC.F/629/2024 which is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Article 14,19(1), 21, of the constitution of India consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order passed by the proceedings of the 4TH respondent RC.F/629/2024 dated 30.12.2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVASU L Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following order:
Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 25.02.2026, 28.01.2026 and 06.01.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 11.03.2026 MP
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 2067 of 2025 Date: 11.03.2026
MP