Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/36/2026 of PEDIMENT CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, IAS on 10 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 36/2026 Between: 1. PEDIMENT CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, REP BY ITS MANAGING

APHC010000062026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 36/2026

Between:

1. PEDIMENT CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, REP BY ITS

MANAGING DIRECTOR A SAL SRINIVAS, S/O A.P. DEVADAS, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, D NO 1-77, GROUND

FLOOR, SRINIVASAPURAM, TIRUCHANOOR ROAD, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 522 238 2.

2. M CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, THE SUPERINTENDING

ENGINEER, PR CIRCLE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

517 001 3

3. K NAGARAJA NAIDU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.I.U., CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 517 001 4.

4. PEEYUSH

KUMAR

IAS,

PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE PLANNING, SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

VELAGAPUCLI,

AMARAVATHI,

GUNTUR

DISTRICT. 522 238

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971

praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon’ble High Court dated 30.04.2024 passed in W.P.No.6449 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI

2.

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 13.04.2024 passed in W.P.No.6449 of 2024.

Sri Chaitanya Polisetty, learned counsel representing Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt.

Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

Date: 11th March, 2026

RKS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead