Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/1050/2025 of The State of Andhra Pradesh, Vs Perni Jaya Sudha on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1050/2025 Between: 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH,, THROUGH THE STATION
APHC010049452025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH,, THROUGH THE STATION
HOUSE OFFICER, BANDAR TALUKA PS, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
A.P., AMARAVATI.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. PERNI JAYA SUDHA, W/O. VENKATRAMAIAH, AGED 52 YEARS
R/O.D. NO.23/346, RAMANAIDUPETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT/ACCUSED
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to Cancel the Bail granted to the Respondent/Accused No.1 in Crl.M.P.No.200 of 2024 dated 30.12.2024 on the file of IX Additional District & Sessions Judge, Krishna at Machilipatnam Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. G.SAI LOCHAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed seeking cancellation of the pre-arrest bail granted to the respondent/Accused No.1 vide order dated 30.12.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.200 of 2024 passed by the learned IX Additional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam, in connection with Crime No.349 of 2024 of Bandar Taluka P.S., Krishna District.
2. Heard Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State/petitioner and Sri G.Sai Lochan, learned counsel for the respondent/accused.
3. As can be seen from the record, it is not the case that the respondent/accused has violated the conditions of bail imposed while granting anticipatory bail to her. However, it is also not in dispute that the respondent/accused has not been cooperating with the investigation after her release.
4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State would submit that he charge sheet has not yet been filed in this matter. It is alleged against the respondent/accused No. 1 that certain funds have been transferred to her account from the accounts of the other accused.
5. Considering the submissions made and upon perusal of the material on record, since this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the judicial discretion exercised by the learned IX Additional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna at Machilipatnam, in granting anticipatory bail to the respondent/accused No. 1, it is apposite to dispose of the present petition by directing the respondent/accused No.1 to cooperate with the investigation and to furnish any material, if required, relating to the present case, so as to enable the investigating agency to conclude the investigation at the earliest possible time.
6. With the above said observations, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.03.2026. UPS
Dt.10.03.2026
UPS