Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/1698/2026 of U Prudviraj Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1698/2026 Between: 1. U PRUDVIRAJ, S/O. LATE DEVID, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
APHC010111622026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. U PRUDVIRAJ, S/O. LATE DEVID, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC
AGRICULTURIST,R/O. DOOR NO. 12-1, HARIJANAWADA, VTC, SATHYAVEDU TOWN ANDMANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGHSTATION HOUSE
OFFICE, OF SATHYAVEDU P.S.,TIRUPATI DISTRICT, REP. BY THE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High CourtPleased to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No. 3 on Anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.94/2025 registered at Sathyavedu Police Station, Tirupathi District, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. VAJJA CHETHAN KUMAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Vajja Chethan Kumar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance.
4. In that view of the matter, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition as and when required.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.03.2026. UPS
Dt.10.03.2026
UPS