Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/827/2012 of GANDI NANI BABU Vs SMT. GANDI VENKATA SUBBALAKSHMI @ RATHU on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 827/2012 Between: 1. GANDI
APHC010372802012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 827/2012
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. GANDI NANI BABU, S/O FEDRICK, TECHNICIAN R/O D.NO. 2-12-10/5, RAMARAJU THOTA, BHIMAVARAM, W.G. DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. SMT GANDI VENKATA SUBBALAKSHMI RATHU, W/o Nani Babu, Housewife R/o Nallam Muthaiah Door NO. 2-12- 74, Ramaraju Thota, Bhimavaram, W.G. District.
...RESPONDENT
IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CMAMP 362 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To expedite the hearing of the appeal by fixing an early date and pass Counsel for the Appellant:
1. TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. P V KRISHNAIAH The Court made the following:
RNTJ & BMJ CMA No.827 of 2012
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 827 of 2012
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This appeal has been filed by the appellant-husband being aggrieved from the dismissal of his petition for divorce under Section 10 and 19 (4) of the Indian Divorce Act.
2. None appears for the appellant.
3. In view of the aforesaid, the Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J
Dated: 10.03.2026 SJ
RNTJ & BMJ CMA No.827 of 2012
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 827/2012
Dated: 10.03.2026 SJ