Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/611/2020 of N C MAHESWARA REDDY Vs Sri. B. Raja Sekhar on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE Nos: 611 & 613 of 2020 CONTEMPT CASE NO:
APHC010205892020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
CONTEMPT CASE Nos: 611 & 613 of 2020
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 611/2020
Between:
1. N C MAHESWARA REDDY, S/O. VENKATA SUBBA REDDY AGE. 55
YEARS
Z.P
HIGH
SCHOOL,
PEDEPULIVARRU,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT,R/O. 1-82-1, SIVALAYUAM STREET , PEDEPULIVARRU
MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI
B
RAJA
SEKHAR,
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
SCHOOL
EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT,A.P.
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI
2. SRI V CHINA VEERABHADRUDU, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR
OF SCHOOL EDUCATION,STATE OF A.P., IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. SRI K SASIBHUSHAN KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HR, FINANCE DEPARTMENT A P SECRETARIT VELAGAPUDI AT
AMARAVATI
R
IMPLEDED
AS
PER
COURT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
DT.16.09.2021. IN CC NO.611 OF 2020
4. SRI KONA SASIDHAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, A P SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI
5. SRI V VIJAYA RAMA RAJU, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION MANGALAGIRI GUNTUR DISTRICT
6. SRI PREEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT A P SECRETARIT VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATI RR 4 TO 6 IMPLEDED AS RESPONDENTS AS PER COURT ORDER DT 23 10 2024. VIDE IA NO.1 OF 2024 IN CC NO 611 OF 2020
7. S MALLIKARJUNA RAO, SUB-TREASURY OFFICER,
SUB- TREASURY OFFICE, REPALLE, BAPATLA DISTRICT, A.P. R 7 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 17.11.2025, VIDE IA NO-2/25 IN CC NO-611 OF 2020
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents for their willful disobedience and violation of orders dated 20/01/2020, passed by this Honble Court in W.P. No. 975 of 2020 and pass such other order or orders IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the proposed Respondents No.3 to 5 as Respondents in the present Contempt Case and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner herein / 6th Respondent on 24-01-2025 vide orders in C.C No.611 of 2020, dt:03.01.2025 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the proposed Respondents No. 7 as Respondent in the present Contempt Case and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P S P SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. G RAJU
2. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA
3.
4. GP FOR SERVICES III (AP)
The Court made the following Common Order:
(per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
Sri G. Raju, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 6 & 7, submits that, all the dues of the petitioners have been cleared.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners admits that, the dues of the petitioners have been cleared. However, earned leave has not yet been paid.
3. In these circumstances, these Contempt Cases are closed, leaving it open to the petitioners to agitate their rights for payment of the earned leave.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
_________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J
Date:10.03.2026 KPV
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
CONTEMPT CASE Nos:611 & 613 of 2020 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
10.03.2026
KPV