Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/11443/2024 of A CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 11443/2024 Between: 1. A CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY, S/O. VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. AGRICULTURE,CONTRACTOR, R/O. ALLAGADDA TOW, MANDAL,
APHC010225332024
IN TH
TUESD
TWO
THE HONOURA
WR
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. A CHANDRASEKH AGED ABOUT 58 ALLAGADDA TOW,
1. THE STATE OF A SECRETARY,
BUILDINGS, NEL DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTE DEPARTMENT,
DISTRICT.
3. THE EXECUTIVE E MI WORKS DIVISIO
4. THE DEPUTY EXE NANDYAL, KUMOO
5. THE ASSISTANT PROGRAMME, AL
6. THE STATE OF A SECRETARY, FINA NELAPADU VILLAG
7. THE DIRECTORAT DIRECTOR OF WO E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL RIT PETITION NO: 11443/2024 HAR REDDY, S/O. VENKATA SU 8 YEARS. AGRICULTURE,CONTRA , MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT,
S LAPADU VILLAGE,
AMARAVA ENDENT ENGINEER, WATER IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KUMOO ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES D ON, NANDYAL, KUMOOL DISTRICT ECUTIVE ENGINEER, SI WORKS S OL DISTRICT. T EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, N LAGADDA MANDAL, KUMOOL DIST ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT ANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIA GE, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRIC TE OF WORKS AND ACCOUNTS, ORKS AND ACCOUNTS 3RD FLO DESH
LAPATI UBBA REDDY, ACTOR, R/O. ...PETITIONER TS PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT ATI, GUNTUR RESOURCES OL, KUMOOL DEPARTMENT, . SUB-DIVISION, NEEM-CHETTU TRICT. TS PRINCIPAL AT BUILDINGS, CT. REP. BY ITS OOR, CBLOCK,
ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT-521456.
8. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS AND ACCOUNTS, TEKKE, NANDYAL,KUMOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of respondents in not processing and uploading the bills for Agreement No.2720/2018-19 for Rs.8,57,281/-, Agreement No.2721/2018-19 for Rs.8,58,439/-, Agreement No.2738/2018-19 for Rs.8,80,304/-, Agreement No.2742/2018-19 for Rs.9,04,777/-, Agreement No.2745/2018-19 for Rs.6,46,650/- and Agreement No.2643/2018- 2019 for Rs.9,27,845/- in CFMS for payment as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to process the bills by uploading into CFMS for Rs.8,57,281/- in respect of Agreement No. 2720/2018-19 dated 28.08.2018, Rs.8,58,439/- in respect of Agreement No. 2721/2018-19 dated 28.08.2018, Rs.8,80,304/- in respect of Agreement No. 2738/2018-19 dated 28.08.2018, Rs.9,04,777/- in respect of Agreement No. 2742/2018-19 dated 28.08.2018, Rs.6,46,650/- in respect of No. 2745/2018-19 dated 28.08.2018 and Rs.9,27,845/- in respect of the same forthwith and Agreement No.2643/2018-19 dated 11.01.2019 and to pay to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the the bills by uploading into CFMS for Rs.8,57,281/- in Respondents to process respect of Agreement No. 2720/2018-19 dated 28.08.2018, Rs.8,58,439/- in respect of Agreement No. 2721/2018-19 dated 28.08.2018, Rs.8,80,304/- in respect of Agreement No. 2738/2018-19 dated 28.08.2018, Rs.9,04,777/- in respect of Agreement No. 2742/2018-19 dated 28.08.2018, Rs.6,46,650/- in respect of Agreement No. 2745/2018-19 dated 28.08.2018 and Rs.9,27,845/- in respect of Agreement No. 2643/2018-19 dated 11.01.2019 and to pay the same forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. C PRAKASH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV
The Court made the following order:
Perusal of record shows that on 24.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondent authorities have paid the amount to the petitioner. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, there is no representation for the petitioner.
Since the respondent authorities have paid the amount to the petitioner, there remains nothing for further adjudication. Hence, the Writ Petition is closed. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (2) months. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 10.03.2026 MP
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 11443 of 2024 Dated: 10.03.2026
MP