Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/3318/2019 of K PADMA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3318/2019 Between: 1. K PADMA, W.G DIST ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, GUNTUR
APHC010074002019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 3318/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. K PADMA, W.G DIST
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, GUNTUR
...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the names of the petitioners for allotment of the house sites ignoring the list prepared in that regard is illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and in violation of Articles 14 & 19 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to allot the house sites to the petitioner at par with the similarly situated persons whose names were mentioned in the list of beneficiaries and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
JS, J W.P.No.3318/2019
To vacate the interim orders dated: 18.03.2019 passed in W.P No. 3318/2019 and dismiss the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent:
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
JS, J W.P.No.3318/2019
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri.V.Dushyanth Reddy, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of the interim orders passed by this Court on 18.03.2019, respondents have issued House Site Pattas and therefore no further orders are required in the present writ petition.
Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 10.03.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 3318/2019
Date: 10.03.2026 rsd