Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/400/2026 of PANCHIREDDY RAMBABU Vs SWAPNIL DINAKAR PUNDKAR on 9 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 400/2026 Between: 1. PANCHIREDDY RAMBABU, S/O. SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RIO. BONTHALAKODURU VILLAGE, ETCHERLA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 1.
APHC010045122026
IN TH
TUESD
TWO
THE HONOURA
CO
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PANCHIREDDY RA 43 YEARS, RIO. MANDAL, SRIKAKU
1. SWAPNIL DINAKA (PANCHAYAT WIN ANDHRA PRADESH
2. K BHARATHI SO OFFICER, SRIKAK
3. I VENKATA RAMA TEKKALI, SRIKAKU Petition under Secti that in the circumstances be pleased to punish the this Hon'ble High Court passed by the Hon'ble C herein and committing su the same, the responden thereof as per Art. 215 o the Contempt of Courts A E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL ONTEMPT CASE NO: 400/2026 AMBABU, S/O. SURYANARAYANA, BONTHALAKODURU VILLAGE, ULAM DISTRICT. AND AR PUNDKAR, THE DISTRICT NG), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, H.532001 WJANYA, THE DISTRICT GRAM KULAM DISTRICT, SRIKAKULAM.532 ANA, THE DIVISIONAL PANCHAY ULAM DISTRICT.532201 ...CO ons 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts A s stated in the affidavit file herein the e respondent herein who have inten t Order, dt.25.11.2025 in W.P. No Court for the offence committed by uch contempt of Hon'ble Court Order nt herein personally responsible and of the Constitution of India, besides S Act, 1971 and pass DESH
LAPATI AGED ABOUT ETCHERLA ...PETITIONER COLLECTOR SRIKAKULAM, PANCHAYAT
YAT OFFICER, ONTEMNOR(S): Act 1971 praying High Court may ntionally violated 30010 of 2025 the respondent rs by disobeying d consequences Sec. 10 to 12 of
IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing original copy of order dated 25.11.2025 in W.P. No. 30010 of 2025 pending disposal of the Contempt Case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N SRIHARI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
The Court made the following order:
This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 25.11.2025 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.30010 of 2025.
Sri N.Srihari, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 25.11.2025 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.30010 of 2025, hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the Contempt Case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 10.03.2026 MP
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO:400 of 2026 Date: 10.03.2026
MP