Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/22074/2013 of A.V. Krupa Sankar Rao, S/o. A.N. Vittal Rao, Vs The Assistant Divisional Engineer (Operations) on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 22074/2013 Between: 1. A.V. KRUPA SANKAR RAO, S/O. A.N. VITTAL RAO,, R/O. DOOR NO.
APHC010353162013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 22074/2013
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. A.V. KRUPA SANKAR RAO, S/O. A.N. VITTAL RAO,, R/O. DOOR NO. 17-3-612, MUKKIDIPETA, PENUGONDA ROAD, HINDUPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATIONS, APCPDCL, HINDUPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
2. A V JAGANNADHA RAO S/O J N VITTAL RAO, R/O. NEAR VEGETABLE MARKET, HINDUPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KOTHAPALLI RAM MOHAN CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL
NJS,J W.P No.22074 of 2013
The Court made the following Order:
Though at the time of considering the matter, it noted that the learned counsel for the petitioner is no more, this Court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition, in the light of the averments made in the counter-affidavit filed by the respondent No.1.
2. The writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in disconnecting the power supply to the Service Connection No.1001037806 as illegal, arbitrary, etc., and for consequential direction to restore the same.
3. In the counter-affidavit filed by the respondent No.1 at Para No.5 inter alia as follows:- “…It is submitted that the disputed service connection was cancelled as per the request of the petitioner with effect from 25.09.2017 and the present status of the service is under permanent dismantlement and no arrears are outstanding against the Service connection. The above writ become infructuous since there is no claim for adjudication before this Hon’ble Court since pending writ, the impugned Service Connection has been cancelled by the petitioner without any protest voluntarily”.
4. In the light of the above stated position, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:10.03.2026 Ksj