Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/29289/2010 of Eduri Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Rao Vs The A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd., on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO:29289 of 2010 Between: 1. EDURI VENKATA LAKSHMI NARASIMHA RAO, S/O. BRAHMANANDA RAO
APHC010428572010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO:29289 of 2010
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. EDURI VENKATA LAKSHMI NARASIMHA RAO, S/O. BRAHMANANDA RAO BUSINESS R/O. FLAT NO.54, 2ND FLOOR, BADAM APARTMENTS, TARNAKA, SECUNDERABAD.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE A P EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CO LTD, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS THE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, APEPDCL, CORPORATE OFFICE, POSTAL COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM (PO) & (DIST.).
2. THE DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, OPERATION DIVISION, APEPDCL, NIDADAVOLE (PO), W.G. DISTRICT.
3. THE ASST ACCOUNTS OFFICER ELECTRICITY REVENUE OFFICE, APEPDCL, KOVVURU (PO), W.G. DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
2. METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO
NJS,J W.P No.29289 of 2010
The Court made the following Order:
Heard Ms. P Vimala Devi, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Perused the docket proceedings.
3. On 20.07.2024, time was granted for filing L.R Petition. Again on 24.02.2026, time was granted for filing L.R Petition.
4. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the sole petitioner died. Despite her best efforts, she could not secure any instructions, for filing L.R Petition.
5. Under those circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. However, liberty is granted to the L.Rs of the petitioner, to file appropriate application in the due course for restoration of the writ petition, in the event cause survives. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:10.03.2026 Ksj