WP/7072/2021 of Bathula Venkata Subbaiah Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 9 March 2026

1. BATHULA VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O LATE SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT

YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE LABOUR,

R/O PABBAPURAM VILLAGE, CHINTHAKOMMADINNE MANDAL, KADAPA. .

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, OFFICE OF COLLECTOR, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3. THE TAHSILDAR, CHINTHAKOMMADINNE MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHINTHAKOMMADINNE POLICE STATION, CHINTHAKOMMADINNE MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

5. SHAIK NOORUDDIN, S/O SHAIK SAHEB PEER SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O 18/75, B.SYED SAHEN STREET, KADAPA TOWN, KADAPA DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ,. order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.3 and 4 in collusion with the unofficial respondent No.5 in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the agriculture land in Sy.No.88/1 to an extent of Ac.2.84 cents (Stotram Lands) situated at Pabbapuram Village, Chinthakommadinne Mandal, Kadapa District, is bad highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, against the Principles of natural Justice and also against the Assignment Act and consequently direct the respondent No.3, 4 and unofficial respondent No.5 not to dispossess the petitioner from the agriculture land in Sy.No.88/I to an extent of Ac.2.84 cents (Stotram Lands) situated at Pabbapuram Village, Chinthakommadinne Mandal, Kadapa District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3, 4 and unofficial respondent No.5 not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in the agriculture land in Sy.No.88,1 to an extent of Ac.2.84 cents (Stotram Lands) situated at Pabbapuram Village, Chinthakommadinne Mandal, Kadapa District till the disposal of the writ petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 25.03.2021 in WP.No.7072 of 2021 and dismiss the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. VENKATESWARLU VALMIKI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

2. GP FOR REVENUE

3. G RAMESH BABU

The Court made the following Order:

On 02.02.2026 & 02.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ on 09.03.2026.

2. Today, despite the matter is being listed under the caption ‘For dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

3. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 10.03.2026

MSI

Dated: 10.03.2026

MSI