Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/14112/2009 of M/s.Ahamadiya Rice Mill and Groundnut Factory Vs Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 14112/2009 Between: 1. M/S.AHAMADIYA RICE MILL AND GROUNDNUT FACTORY, 28/144 ALIMABAD
APHC010662812009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14112/2009
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M/S.AHAMADIYA RICE MILL AND GROUNDNUT FACTORY, 28/144 ALIMABAD STREET RAYACHOTY 516269,KADAPA DISTRICT REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR S.ABDUL GAFFAR SAHEB S/O SHAIK MOHIUDDIN SAHEB
YEARS OF RAYACHOTY,KADAPA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A P, OPERATION CIRCLE KADAPA,REP.BY ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER,OPERATION,KADAPA DISTRICT
2. SOTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDRA PRADESH, LIMITED REP.BY ITS DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION RAYACHOTI,KADAPA DISTRICT
3. SOTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDRA PRADESH, LIMITED REP.BY ITS ASSISTANT ENGINEER OPERATION RAYACHOTI,KADAPA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
NJS,J W.P No.14112 of 2009
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D SESHASAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL
2. JAGARLAMUDIKOTESWARIDEVI(SC FORAPSPDCL)
NJS,J W.P No.14112 of 2009
The Court made the following Order:
Though the matter is listed under the caption “for Orders”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Under the said circumstances, this Court is constrained to dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:10.03.2026 Ksj