Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/827/2013 of T. Doraswamy Naidu Vs Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Trust Board on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 827/2013 Between: 1. T. DORASWAMY NAIDU, S/O T. VENKATARAMA NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 69
APHC010413232013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 827/2013
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. T. DORASWAMY NAIDU, S/O T. VENKATARAMA NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O SHOP NO 1, IN FRONT OF 'IND NEW CHOULTRY, NEAR CRO OFFICE, TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
2. JABU DEVI, W/O KUMAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O SHOP NO 3, IN FRONT OF IIND NEW CHOULTRY, NEAR CRO OFFICE, TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
3. CHINTALA LAXMAIAH, S/O LATE C. VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O SHOP NO 5, IN FRONT OF IIND NEW
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS TRUST BOARD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST..
2. THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
3. THE JOINT EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
4. THE HEALTH OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
5. P VENKATARATNAM, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS PUSH CART BUNK NO 4, IN FRONT OF IIND NEW
NJS,J W.P No.827 of 2013
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. C M R VELU
2. V R N PRASHANTH
3. P R K AMERANDRA KUMAR
NJS,J W.P No.827 of 2013
The Court made the following Order:
Mr. N V S Prasada Varma, learned Standing Counsel appeared on behalf of the T.T.D.
2. Mr. P Niranjan Reddy, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
3. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders, if any, granted on the earlier occasion shall stand dissolved. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:10.03.2026 Ksj