Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2736/2023 of PILLI VIJAYA NIRMALA Vs PATTEM SUNDARA RAO on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2736/2023 Between: 1. PILLI VIJAYA NIRMALA, W/O LATE SUNDARA RAO, AGE 49
APHC010521232023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2736/2023
Between:
1. PILLI VIJAYA NIRMALA, W/O LATE SUNDARA RAO, AGE 49
YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O 38TH WARD, LANKAPETA, BHIMAVARAM-2, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT.
2. PILLI MANI KUMAR,, S/O LATE SUNDARA RAO, AGED ABOUT
31 YEARS, OCC. PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O 38TH WARD, LANKAPETA, BHIMAVARAM-2, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL, WEST
GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. PILLI JESSY,, S/O LATE SUNDARA RAO, W/O NALLI VENKAT, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O 38TH
WARD,
LANKAPETA,
BHIMAVARAM-2,
BHIMAVARAM
MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. PATTEM SUNDARA RAO, S/o Prakasa Rao, aged about 49
years, Occ. Business, R/o Balusumudi, Bhimavaram -2, Bhimavaram Mandal, West Godavari Dist.
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the order Dt. 20-07-2023 in I.A.No.114 of 2019 in
0.S.No. 249 of 2017 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Bhimavaram and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order Dt. 20-07-2023 in E.P.No. 114 of 2019
in O.S.No. 249 of 2017 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Bhimavaram, pending disposal of the main CRP and to pass such other order(s)
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in CRP No. 2736 of 2023
on the file of this Honourable Court dated 19-10-2023 in the interest of Justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. S SURENDRA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. M P V N V SASTRI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
On 18.12.2025, 10.02.2026 & 24.02.2026, there is no representation for the petitioner and the matter posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 10th March, 2026
RKS