Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/14162/2011 of Alapati Satyanarayana Vs The Eastern Power Distribution company on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 14162/2011 Between: 1. ALAPATI SATYANARAYANA, S/O.LATE ANJANEYULU, RESIDING AT 2-71,
APHC010696182011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14162/2011
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. ALAPATI SATYANARAYANA, S/O.LATE ANJANEYULU, RESIDING AT 2-71, MARKONDAPADU, CHAGALLU MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN HYDERABAD
2. THE DIVISIONAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, A.P.TRANSCO, NIDADOVOLU, W.G.DISTRICT
3. THE ASSISTANT, ENGINEER, A.P.TRANSCO, CHAGALLU, W.G.DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S SREERAMACHANDRA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
2. METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO
NJS,J W.P No.14162 of 2011
The Court made the following Order:
At the time of considering the matter, it is noted that the learned counsel for the petitioner is no more.
2. Heard Ms. Aishwarya Chowdary, learned Junior Standing Counsel for A.P.E.P.D.C.L.
3. The petitioner filed the present writ petition seeking to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents no to lay any electrical wires in his land in R.S Nos.13/2B, 13/3, 13/4B and 13/2 situate in Markondapadu Village of Chagally Mandal, West Godavari District.
4. In the light of the instructions received by the learned Junior Standing Counsel, a copy of which is placed for perusal of this Court, this writ petition is being disposed of.
5. In the said written instructions, it is inter alia stated as follows:- “While objections raised by the petitioner, the proposed estimate i.e releasing the service connection with the existing 11kv lines passing through the petitioner’s fields was changed by releasing the service connections with 11kv Nelaturu feeder without touching a single inch of Petitioner’s land”.
6. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive.
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:10.03.2026 Ksj