Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1929/2017 of SMT Y AHALYA, KRISHNA DIST. Vs P. SANTHA LAXMI, GUNTUR DIST. on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3565] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1929/2017 Between: 1. SMT Y AHALYA, KRISHNA
APHC010711692017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1929/2017
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SMT Y AHALYA, KRISHNA DIST., W/O RAGHUNADH KUMAR, AGED 62 YEARS R/O FLAT NO. 303, KRISHNA RESIDENCY NEAR ANKITHA APARTMENTS RAMAVARAPPADU, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER AND
1. P SANTHA LAXMI GUNTUR DIST, President The Guntur Women Cooperative Urban Bank Limited Ven-Lock Market, 1st Floor Near Vegetable Market Guntur-522003, Guntur District
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent-bank for willful, deliberate and intentional violation of order of the Hon'ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy and Hon'ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram passed in WA No. 1144 of 2011 dated 22.09.2014 under section 10 to 12 of the contempt of the court act and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(APPL 862 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to release the pensionary benefits', gratuity, earned leave, bonus and other statutory benefits to which the Petitioner is entitled to for the period from December, 1981 till the date of superannuation, i.e. September, 2014 as per the orders of Hontie High Court in Writ Appeal No. 1144 of 2011 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. B NARASIMHA SARMA The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CONTEMPT CASE No.1929 of 2017
ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) s
There is no representation for the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that this Contempt Case has been filed for complaining the willful disobedience against the order,dated 22.09.2014 in W.A.No.1144 of 2011, passed by the Division Bench of this Court. He further submits thatthe respondentdied on 16.11.2022. He further contends that the Supreme Court, by order dated 17.01.2019 in SLP (C) No.7619 of 2015, closed the contempt case in C.C.No.1929 of 2017, pending before this Court.
4. In view of the above factual position, in our view, no further adjudication is required in this case, as it has already been closedby the Hon’ble Apex Court.
5. Accordingly, no further orders are required in this contempt case.
6. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date:10.03.2026 SA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CONTEMPT CASE No.1929 of 2017
Dt.10.03.2026 SA