Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/3417/2019 of Mavuri Satya Veera Santosh Mohan Balaji Vs THE STATE OF AP on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3417/2019 Between: 1. MAVURI SATYA VEERA SANTOSH MOHAN BALAJI, S/O VENAKTA RAMANA, AGED
APHC010076462019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 3417/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MAVURI SATYA VEERA SANTOSH MOHAN BALAJI, S/O VENAKTA RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O D.NO.53-33-16, K.R.M COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, ARNARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, ANANDAPURAM,
4. PATHIVADA APPALA NARASAMMA, W/O LATE KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O VEMULAVALASA VILLAGE, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
5. PATHIVADA GOPI, S/O LATE KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O VEMULAVALASA VILLAGE, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
6. PATHIVADA GANESH, S/O LATE KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O VEMULAVALASA VILLAGE, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
7. PATHIVADA NAGA, S/O LATE KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O VEMULAVALASA VILLAGE,
ANANDAPURAM MANDAL,
JS, J W.P.No.3417/2019
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Prohibition restraining the 2nd respondent from entertaining and deciding the Revision vide R.P.No.71 of 2018 instituted by the respondents No.4 to 8 herein under the provisions of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, in so far as the property situated in Sy.No.95/2 with an extent of Ac.0.64 cents of Vemulavalasa Village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay of all further proceedings in R.P.No.71 of 2018 on the file of the 2nd respondent pending disposal of writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the order dated 14.03.2019 passed in W.P No. 3417 of 2019 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. S PRANATHI
JS, J W.P.No.3417/2019
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri.D.Prasad Kumar, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 10.03.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 3417/2019
Date: 10.03.2026 rsd