Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/883/2012 of KHAMBAM PRASANNA KUMARI @ GILUGU PRASANNA KUMARI Vs GILUGU PRABHUDAS on 9 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 883/2012 Between: 1. KHAMBAM
APHC010458922012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 883/2012
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KHAMBAM PRASANNA KUMARI @ GILUGU PRASANNA KUMARI, W/O.G.PRABHUDAS R/O.INTUR [V], AMARTHALURU [M], GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. GILUGU PRABHUDAS, S/o.late G.Nagendra Rao R/o.Peddapulivarru [V], Giluguvaripalem, Bhattiprolu [M], Guntur District.
...RESPONDENT
IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 1554 OF 2012
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 7 days in representing the above CMASR No.30895/2012
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following:
RNTJ & BMJ CMA No.883 of 2012
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 883 of 2012
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This appeal has been filed by the appellant-wife being aggrieved from the dismissal of her petition for divorce under Section 10(1)(x) and 37 and 40 of the Divorce Act.
2. None appears for the appellant.
3. In view of the aforesaid, the Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J
Dated: 10.03.2026 SJ
RNTJ & BMJ CMA No.883 of 2012
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 883/2012
Dated: 10.03.2026 SJ