Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2575/2024 of GANJIKUNTA RUKMINAMMA Vs GANJIKUNTA RAMASUBBA REDDY on 8 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2575/2024 Between: 1. GANJIKUNTA RUKMINAMMA, W/O. LATE SUBBA REDDY, AGED
APHC010473662024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2575/2024
Between:
1. GANJIKUNTA RUKMINAMMA, W/O. LATE SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC-HOUSE WIFE, R/O.D.NO.4/229, KANAPALLI
VILLAGE,
KHADARABAD
POST,
PRODDATURMANDAL, YSR DISTRICT.
2. GOSULA SESHIKALA, W/O.SURENDRANATH REDDY, AGED
ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC-HOUSE WIFE, R/O.D.NO.1/48, ALLADUPALLE VILLAGE AND POST, CHAPADU MANDAL, YSR
DISTRICT.
3. GOSULA SESHIKALA, W/O.SURENDRANATH REDDY, AGED
ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O.D.NO.1/48, ALLADUPALLE VILLAGE AND POST, CHAPADU MANDAL, YSR
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. GANJIKUNTA RAMASUBBA REDDY, S/O. LATE SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.3-39, RTC COLONY, MANDINAGUNDA, HYDERABAD.
2. OBULAM DHANUNJAYA REDDY, S/O.NARAPU REDDY, AGED
ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O.KANAIA VILLAGE
AND POST, NANDYALA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
3. GANJIKUNTA RAMANA REDDY, S/O.LATE SUBBA REDDY, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
OCC-
CONTRACTOR,
R/O.D.NO.4/229, KANAPALLI VILLAGE, KHADARABAD POST, PRODDATUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. KATTAMRRDI VARALAKSHMI, W/O.MADHU SUDHANA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC-HOUSE WIFE, R/O.D.NO.
15/448, BALAJI NAGAR-1, MYDUKURU ROAD, PRODDATUR, YSR DISTRICT
5. GOGANTI SUNEETHA BUJJI, W/O.SURENDRANATH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC-TEACHER, R/O.METTUPALLI
VILLAGE, AVUKU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the order, dated 30.07.2024 made in I.A.No.1288 of 2021 in O.S.No.64 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Proddatur, Y.S.R District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.64 of 2012 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Proddatur, YSR District, pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the stay granted on 29-10-2024 in I.A. No. 1 of 2024 in CRP No. 2575 of 2024 and dismiss the Civil revision Petition in limini with exemplary costs and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased to permit me to amend the Cause Title of the respondent No.3 as ‘Proddatur Mandal, Kadapa District’ instead of ‘Nandyala Mandal, Kurnool District’ and the respondent No.5 as ‘R/o.Mettupalli Village, Avuku Mandal, Kurnool District’ instead of ‘R/o.Kanala Village and Post, Nandyala Mandal, Kurnool District’ in the Civil Revision Petition I.A.No.1 of 2024 in C.R.P.No.2575 of 2024 as well as in
C.R.P.No.2575 of 2024 and pass s
IA NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 5 days in filling the interlocutory application filed to recall the Order, dated 14.07.2025 in C.R.P.No.2575
of 2024 and pass
IA NO: 3 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 68days in representing the interlocutory application filed to recall the Order, dated 14.07.2025 in
C.R.P.No.2575 of 2024 and pass
IA NO: 4 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to recall the Order, dated 14.07.2025 in C.R.P.No.2575 of 2024 and thereby restore the civil revision petition in C.R.P.No.2575 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 5 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filling of certified copy of the Order, dated 14.07.2025 in C.R.P.No.2575 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. V R REDDY KOVVURI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K DEVANATH
2. shaik omer qaiyum
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.1288 of 2021 in O.S.No.64 of 2012 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Proddatur, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.
2. Heard Sri Vigneshwar Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvuri, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri N.Sai Akash, learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for both the parties brought to the notice of this Court that as against the orders passed in two interlocutory applications vide I.A.Nos.1288 & 1289 of 2021 in O.S.No.64 of 2012, defendant Nos.3, 5 & 7 to the suit filed two Civil Revision Petitions vide C.R.P.Nos.2575 & 2576 of 2024 and C.R.P.No.2576 of 2024 has been disposed of by this Court on 28.11.2025 setting aside the order passed by the trial Court in I.A.No.1289 of 2021 in O.S.No.64 of 2012 and remanding the matter back to the Court below for fresh adjudication.
4. On that particular day, as the present Civil Revision Petition which is connected to C.R.P.No.2576 of 2024 was not listed, learned counsel for both the parties requested to dispose of this Revision in terms of the order passed in that C.R.P.No.2576 of 2024.
5. Recording the said submissions, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the I.A as observed by this Court in C.R.P.No.2576 of 2024. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 09th March, 2026
RKS