Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/17183/2025 of P.Govindu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 8 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 17183/2025 Between: 1. P.GOVINDU,, S/O RAGHAVALU, AGED 62 YEARS, D.NO. 16-22-79,

APHC010335232025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

WRIT PETITION NO: 17183/2025

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. P.GOVINDU,, S/O RAGHAVALU, AGED 62 YEARS, D.NO. 16-22-79, PALLAMRAJU NAGAR, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

2. THE COMMISSIONER, COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, A.P.E.W.I.D.C. CORPORATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT.

4. THE PRINCIPAL, PITHAPUR RAJA'S GOVERNMENT COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS) OPP. LAURIN HIGH SCHOOL, RAJA RAM MOHAN ROY ROAD, KAKINADA

5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

NJS,J W.P No.17183 of 2025

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

NJS,J W.P No.17183 of 2025

The Court made the following Order:

At the time of considering the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that pending the writ petition, the respondents have paid the amount due to the petitioner. Therefore, requested this Court to close the writ petition.

2. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:09.03.2026 Ksj

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead