Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/1571/2026 of Bellamkonda Venkata Gowtham Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 8 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between: 1. BELLAMKONDA VENKATA GOWTHAM, S/O. KRISHNA,AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,R/O.BAKTHA VATSALA NAGAR,OPP
APHC010103002026
IN THE H
(
MONDAY
TWO T
THE HONOURABLE DR
CRIMIN
Between:
1. BELLAMKONDA
VE
ABOUT 32 YEARS,R
MANDIR,NELLORE, P
1. THE STATE OF AND
Ongole Taluq Police
Public Prosecutor, Hig
Petition under Section
praying that in the circums
Criminal Petition, the High
bail in Crime No.249/2025
Ongole, Prakasam District
Counsel for the Petitioner
1.P NAGENDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Responde
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTO
The Court made the follow
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Y,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH
THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
R JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PR
NAL PETITION NO: 1571/2026
ENKATA
GOWTHAM,
S/O.
KRISH
R/O.BAKTHA VATSALA NAGAR,OPP
PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/A
AND
DHRA PRADESH, Through Station Hou
Station, Ongole, Prakasam District R
gh Court at Amaravathi.
...RESPONDENT/COMP
n 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528
stances stated in the Memorandum of G
Courtmay be pleased to release the P
on the file of the Ongole Taluq Polic
in the interest of justice
r/accused:
Y
ent/complainant:
OR
wing:
[3396]
RATAPA
HNA,AGED
KRISHNA
ACCUSED
se Officer,
Rep., by its
PLAINANT
8 of BNSS
Grounds of
etitioner on
ce Station,
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1571/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioners/Accused Nos.2 & 5, seeking regular bail, in Crime.No. bail in Crime No.249/2025 on the file of the Ongole Taluq Police Station, Ongole, Prakasam District, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 331(5), 103(1), 351(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNS’).
2. Heard Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners/Accused No.4 and Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.
3. This is the 3rd bail application filed before this Court. Earlier, the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court dismissed the bail application filed by the petitioner/Accused No.4, vide Crl.P.Nos.588 of 2026 and 12492 of 2025.
4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that the allegation against the petitioner is absolutely false. The petitioner did not participate in the commission of the offence and only based on the confession of the other accused, the police arrested the petitioner on 14.05.2025 and sent to judicial remand and the investigation is substantially completed and key witnesses have already been examined. Therefore, further custodial interrogation serves no purpose.
5. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State would submit that the present case pertains to a heinous and premeditated offence involving the brutal murder of the deceased, which has shocked the conscience of society. The allegations against the accused persons, including the present petitioner, disclose a clear and well-orchestrated criminal conspiracy resulting in the intentional taking of a human life. The gravity and seriousness of the offence, coupled with the way it was executed, disentitle the petitioner to the relief of bail at this stage. She would further submit that there is no change of circumstances from the date of dismissal of the 1st and 2nd bail application in Crl.P.Nos.588 of 2026 and 12492 of 2025. She finally submits that the petition is liable to be dismissed.
6. Considering the nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the petitioner, his alleged role played in this case and there is no change of circumstances from the date of dismissal of the 1st and 2nd bail application in Crl.P.Nos.588 of 2026 and 12492 of 2025, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage.
7. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
__________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.03.2026. KKV
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1571/2026
Date: 09.03.2026. KKV