WP/4860/2008 of M/S. SYNERGIES CASTINGS LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM. Vs C.T.O., GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM & 2 OTHERS on 8 March 2026

1. M/S. SYNERGIES CASTINGS LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM., #3, VISAKHAPTANAM SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE (VSEZ), DUVVADA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530046, REP. BY ITS SR. OFFICER - ACCOUNTS, SHRI B.S.S.V. NARAYANA.

...PETITIONER AND

1. C T O GAJUWAKA VISAKHAPATNAM 2 OTHERS, GAJUWAKA CIRCLE, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM.

2. THE DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, GAJUWAKA CIRCLE, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM.

3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CT INT, VISAKHAPATNAM.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ / direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus directing the impugned notice dated 12.02.2008 passed by the by the 1st respondent as illegal, unjustified and contrary to the provisionss of the law and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 6308 OF 2008

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the impugned notice dated 12.02.2008 by the 2nd respondent distrained order to the petitioner under Section 8 of the A.P. Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 during the pendency of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 4 OF 2008(WPMP 100780 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. S.V.S.S.SIVA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. ...

2. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX

The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)

The petitioner herein, being aggrieved by the order of the Appellate Deputy Commissioner, dated 27.04.2006, preferred an Appeal before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. During the pendency of this Appeal, the petitioner sought stay of collection of tax, by filing an application, before the Joint Commissioner (legal). However, the 1st respondent – Assessing Officer, had issued an order of attachment of the bank account of the petitioner, on 28.07.2006. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner had moved this Court, by way of W.P.No.15911 of 2006, which came to be disposed of, on 03.08.2006, by revoking the attachment or condition of the petitioner giving immovable property as security to the satisfaction of the 1st respondent. Even while these proceedings were pending, another distraint order in Form - 1, was issued by the 2nd respondent against which the present Writ Petition has been filed.

2. It appears that, during the pendency of this Writ Petition, T.A.No.141 of 2007, filed before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, has been allowed in favour of the petitioner, by way of an Order, dated 27.07.2009.

3. In those circumstances, nothing further survives in this Writ Petition and accordingly, it is closed.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J

Date: 09.03.2026 KPV

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR

WRIT PETITION No.4860 of 2008 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)

09.03.2026

KPV