Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/191/2026 of CHEEDELLA SURESH BABU Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 8 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 191/2026 Between: 1. CHEEDELLA SURESH BABU, S/O LATE
APHC010093892026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 191/2026
Between:
1. CHEEDELLA SURESH BABU, S/O LATE VEERANJANEYULU,AGED
ABOUT 43 YEARS, BUSINESS,R/O D.N0.1-3/4-176A, VADDERIVAH
STREET,VIDYADHARAPURAM,
VIJAYAWADA
-
520012,NTR
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ,REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,HIGH
COURT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,AT
AMARAVATI.
2. CHEEDELLA NAGA VENKATA KANAKADURGA GUNA SANGEETHA
LAKSHMI, W/O SURESH BABU,D/O CHLALUVADI VENKATA GANGA
ANJA PURNACHANDRA RAO,AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE,R/O D.NO.4-4-15/8,GRANDHI MADHAVA RAMADEVI
NILAYAM,NEAR
PERUGUCHETTU
CENTRE,
BEHIND
SIVALAYAM.AGRAHARAM, ELURU - 534001, ELURU DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PHANI BABU YALAMANCHILI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SARASWATHI A
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 191 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
The instant Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioner/respondent seeking to set aside the order dated 18.08.2025 passed in F.C.O.P.No.168 of 2023 on the file of the Court of Family Judge-cum-VII Additional District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru.
2. Heard Sri Y. Phani Babu, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Smt. A. Saraswathi, learned counsel for the Respondent No.2. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the impugned order is unsustainable in law. The respondent-wife voluntarily left the matrimonial home without any sufficient reason. The petitioner is engaged in the business of jute and rope. The maintenance granted to the respondent– wife is excessive and exorbitant.
4. Learned counsel for Respondent No.2 would submit that the Trial Court has awarded maintenance to the respondent-wife after proper consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, and the impugned order is well- reasoned. Therefore, the impugned order does not warrant any interference by this Court, and the learned counsel prays for dismissal of the present revision.
5. On perusal of the record, it is evident that the learned Trial Judge, upon appreciation of the evidence on record and with proper perspective, and after taking into consideration the necessities of the petitioner’s wife as well as the financial capacity of the husband, who is engaged in work in a jute factory, granted maintenance to the wife.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the impugned order passed by the learned Judge is a well- reasoned order and does not warrant interference by this Court.
7. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. However, the petitioner/husband is directed to clear the arrears amount, if any, within a period of six (6) months from today, by way of monthly installments.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date:09.03.2026 KNN
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Crl.R.C.No.191 of 2026 Dt.09.03.2026
KNN