Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/1660/2026 of M Sankar Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 8 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1660/2026 Between: M SANKAR REDDY, S/O LATE M. VENKAT REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43
APHC010108252026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1660/2026
Between:
M SANKAR REDDY, S/O LATE M. VENKAT REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43
YEARS, R/O B. JARRAVARIPALLE, H/O KELLAPATIA,GANGAVARAM
MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. MEDAPATI SANTOSH REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The instant petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed seeking to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner, in connection with Crime No.205 of 2025 on the file of Gangavaram Urban Police Station, Chittoor District which is registered for the offence under Section 109(1), 118(1) and 115(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. Sri Medapati Santosh Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner / Accused No.4 would submit that the Petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged and the Petitioner is falsely implicated in the present crime. It is submitted that the Petitioner is ready to furnish the sureties to the satisfaction of the Court.
3. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the petition and would submit that there are specific allegations against the Petitioner and that no case is made out to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner.
4. Considering the submissions made and on a perusal of the material on record, the nature of the offence alleged against the Petitioner, this Court is of the view there are no grounds to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner.
5. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. The Petitioner shall surrender before the concerned Court and move a regular bail application. On filing such application, the learned Judge may pass appropriate orders according to law as expeditiously as possible.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________
Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.03.2026 Dinesh
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1660 of 2026
DATE:09.03.2026
Dinesh