Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/25437/2009 of B. Saradamma Vs The Vice Chairman and managing Director on 8 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 25437 OF 2009 Between: 1. B. SARADAMMA, W/O. KESAVA REDDY PROPERITOR OF M/S. AGRO RYTHU
APHC010587652009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3209]
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 25437 OF 2009
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. B. SARADAMMA, W/O. KESAVA REDDY PROPERITOR OF M/S. AGRO RYTHU SEVA KANDRAM ANANTHAPUR MANDAL, R/O. H.NO. 28-417-B, SANGAMESH NAGAR ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, AGRO INDUSTRIES, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. HYDERABAD
2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, AGRO INDUSTRIES, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. HYDERABAD
3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT
4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT
5. THE MANDAL AGRICULTURE OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT
6. K ARJUNAMMA, W/O. K. NARAYANA REDDY HOUSEWIFE R/O. 28- 2-965, NAVODAYA COLONY ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR TOWN AND DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. T S V L N SWAMY (SC FOR AGRO IDC LTD)
2. K SRINIVAS
3. BANDA PRASADA RAO(SC FOR TSAIDC)
The Court made the following ORDER:
At the time of considering the matter, Mr.S.Mahendra, learned counsel representing Mr.N.Aswartha Narayana, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, the Interim Order granted on 20.11.2009, shall stand dissolved. NINALA JAYASURYA, J Date:09.03.2026 Ssv
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 25437 OF 2009 Date:09.03.2026 Ssv