Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/352/2018 of DEVARABHOTLA SKSN VARA PRASAD Vs Sri. SP Tucker on 6 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] SATURDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 352/2018 Between: 1. DEVARABHOTLA SKSN VARA PRASAD, R/O D.NO. 2-71/1 ATHREYAPURAM
APHC010099162018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 352/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. DEVARABHOTLA SKSN VARA PRASAD, R/O D.NO. 2-71/1 ATHREYAPURAM ROAD, LOLLA, E.G.DISTRICT.
2. DEVARABHOTLA VIDYADHAR, R/O H.NO. 7-67-B10, SANTOSHNAGAR ENCLAVE, DAMMAIGUDA
MEDCHAL, MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. SRI SP TUCKER, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI KARTHIKEYA MISHRA, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AT KAKINADA.
3. SRI R GOVINDA RAO, DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, EAST GODAVARI DITRICT AT KAKINADA.
4. SRI VARADA SUBBA RAO, TAHSILDAR, ATHREYAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. SRI VIJAYKUMAR, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, LOLLA GRAM PANCHAYAT LOLLA VILLAGE, ATHREYAPURAM MANDAL, E.G.DISTRICT.
6. SMT SATYAVENI, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROADS AND
BUILDINGS KOTHAPET, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
7. SRI MANIKUMAR, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DEPARTMENT KOTHAPET, E.G.DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents herein before this Hon'ble Court and to punish them for willfully and deliberately disobeying the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P.No.6791of 2017 in W.P.No.5572 of 2017 dt.16-2-2017,in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KAUSHIK KUMBHAJADALA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.
2. K NARSI REDDY
The Court made the following ORDER:
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that the present contempt case is moved against the alleged violation of interim order and the same would not survive as the main writ petition is closed on 12.05.2023.
In those circumstances, nothing further survives in this case and accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
Date: 07.03.2026 KA
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 352/2018
Date: 07.03.2026 KA